Legal Opinion
Haddad v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided December 23, 1999No. 01-98-01411-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADELE HEDGES, Justice.
Appellant pled nob contendere to the offense of violating the Houston sexually oriented business enterprise ordinance. The trial judge found her guilty and assessed punishment at 45 days confinement. We affirm.
Background
This appeal is a constitutional challenge of the Houston city ordinance regulating sexually oriented businesses and the conduct of their employees (“the ordinance”). See Houston, Tex., Code op ORdinances Art. VIII, § 28-251 to -259 (1997). Appellant, a topless dancer, was charged by complaint and information with the misde meanor violation of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- State v. Chacon, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Telia D. Casel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Ex Parte Smalley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.