Strickland v. Motors Insurance Corp. (MIC)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Vickie Strickland appeals the district court’s finding that she possessed constructive notice that her automobile insurance coverage had lapsed and the court’s resulting decision to grant summary judgment in favor of appellee Motors Insurance Corporation. Because we read the Mississippi case law as stating that constructive notice is insufficient to overcome a statutorily compelled requirement of thirty days notice in this situation, we reverse the district court’s order granting summary judgment. The district court’s denial of Strickland’s claim for punitive damages against Motors…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss. v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Karl R. Gorman v. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Jackson v. Bd. of Ed. of Oktibbeha CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Carter v. Allstate Indem. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Crawford v. BROWNMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Strickland v. Motors Insurance Corporation Mic)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992