Legal Opinion
Williamsville Central School District v. Cannon Partnership
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 1989No. Appeal No. 1Published
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to appellants, in accordance with the following memorandum: The order is modified by directing that plaintiff and defendant Celotex shall be required to produce only so much of their experts’ reports as contain factual data relating to the roof at the Williamsville East High School (see, McKinstry v Werner Mach. Co., 133 AD2d 361; Rogowski v Day Co., 130 Mise 2d 801; see also, Stevens v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 117 AD2d 733; Anastasia v Barnes, 109 AD2d 769; Terwilliger v Leach Co., 88 AD2d 910: Kraus v Ford…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stevens v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Anastasia v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Kraus v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- McKinstry v. Werner Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Terwilliger v. Leach Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982