Wilson v. McClendon

GOODWYN, Justice.

Appellees insist that appellants’ brief fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 10, and, as a consequence, the assignments of error, even if made in compliance with Supreme Court Rule 1, should be considered as waived. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rules 1 and 10, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. We are constrained to agree with this insistence.

There are six assignments of error. Appellants’ brief recites that “Al of the assignments of error raise practically the same proposition.” But it is not at all clear what the particular error is which appellants rely on for a…