Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Moseley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the United States Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
The defendant in error (hereinafter designated the “plaintiff”) in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory recovered judgment against the plaintiff in error (hereinafter designated the “defendant”) for damages to her land in the sum of $1,980, with interest at 6 per cent, from July 4, 1895, which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Ap*73peals of the Territory, to reverse which this writ of error is prosecuted.
In 1893 the plaintiff, under the homestead law, owned a tract of land of 137 acres, bordering’ on the east bank of the Canadian…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Powers v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Nichols v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MaherIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Henderson v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Rhodes v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- City of Tucson v. Apache MotorsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Hayes v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District v. BartonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.