Legal Opinion

Springdale Winnelson Co. v. Rakes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1999No. 98-1275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellant, Springdale Winnelson Company, a supply company, sought reimbursement from appellees, Alan Rakes and his company, Al’s Plumbing, Inc., for gross-receipts taxes paid on the sale of tangible personal property. The Benton County Circuit Court granted appellees’s Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that no statutory authority existed to allow Winnelson to pursue an action against Rakes for the reimbursement of uncollected sales taxes. Winnelson brings this appeal, alleging that the trial court erred in dismissing their claim, arguing that Arkansas law places the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees v. StodolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Jernigan v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. RothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Cheney v. FrederickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Womack v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Books-A-Million, Inc. v. Arkansas Painting & Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Buck v. GillhamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Pine Meadow Autoflex, LLC v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Bill's Printing, Inc. v. CarderCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API