People v. Dixon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1ConcurrenceHopkins, J.
I am entirely in accord with my colleagues for reversal and a new trial because of the denial of an additional peremptory challenge. However, I believe also that the use of peremptory challenges by the prosecution to excuse ¿11 the black members of the jury panel was a violation of the defendants’ constitutional rights. Defense counsel objected to the use of peremptory challenges to the three black prospective jurors. The trial court did not inquire of the prosecutor as to the exercise of the challenges, indicating that the discretion of the prosecutor was beyond inquiry. However, the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. HearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- People v. BurrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- People v. BurneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.