Legal Opinion
Jahns v. Julian
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 30, 2018No. Case No. 2:16–cv–0239–JMS–DLPPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Chief Judge
Petitioner Jason Jahns seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). His petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted .
A. Background
Jahns was charged in the Northern District of Ohio (Western Division) in No. 3:10-cr-00435-DAK with being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). In 2012, he pled guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement.
At sentencing Jahns was deemed an armed career criminal, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and received an executed sentence of 240 months. Section 924(e) applies to persons with three prior violent felonies or serious drug…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rhodes v. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020