Legal Opinion

Hamblin v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 5, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment fixing the boundary line between appellants’ land and the adjoining land of appellees. The relief granted carried with it a reformation of the deeds of both parties to conform to the division line fixed by the court.

The appellants have brought to this court only a partial record which omits the testimony heard in the lower court. We are, therefore, confined in our review to the sufficiency of the pleadings to support the judgment. Upon all disputed issues of fact, we are required to assume that the evidence supports the finding of the lower court.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carr v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Martin v. WagersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. Althaus v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, Inc. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. WeartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1982
  3. Burberry v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  4. Porter v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. WootenKentucky Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API