Bauer v. Female Academy of the Sacred Heart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentPeters, J.
(dissenting.) As the majority noted, the Court of Appeals has expressly declined to address whether Labor Law § 202 provides the exclusive remedy in cases involving the cleaning of windows (see, Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp., 87 NY2d 938, 939; see also, Terry v Young Men’s Hebrew Assn., 78 NY2d 978, 979). We believe that the factual circumstances presented by a particular case might warrant the application of the protections afforded by Labor Law § 240 (1) where the activity engaged in may not constitute “cleaning” within the meaning of Labor Law § 202 (see, Vernum v Zilka, 241 AD2d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Christopher Street Owners Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Vernum v. ZilkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Terry v. Young Men's Hebrew Ass'n of Washington Heights, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Ferrari v. Niasher Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cruz v. Bridge Harbor Heights AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998