Commonwealth v. Rosado
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.
Before us is the Commonwealth’s interlocutory appeal from an order of a District Court judge allowing the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless stop of a motor vehicle. After an evidentiary hearing at *209which State Trooper David Pinkham was the sole witness, the judge concluded that Pinkham lacked constitutional justification to (1) open the door to the defendant’s vehicle, (2) seize an item that was not an illegal weapon, and (3) remove the defendant from the vehicle and restrain him. We conclude that the judge erred in applying the law to the facts found and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. BorgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JanvierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2024
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. PolancoMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Torres-PaganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018