Legal Opinion

Jenks v. Bertelsen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2004No. 02-613PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 The plaintiffs and appellants, Robin and Cathy Jenks (Jenkses), brought a negligence action in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court to recover damages for personal injury from Neil Bertelsen (Bertelsen), defendant and respondent, arising out of an automobile accident. Following a trial and jury verdict, the District Court denied the Jenkses’ motion for a new trial. The Jenkses appeal. We affirm.

¶2 The following issues are presented on appeal:

f 3 1. Did the District Court err in excluding plaintiffs’ evidence of dealings with the insurance carrier in response to the defendant’s theory…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Massman v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Lopez v. JosephsonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Keil v. Glacier Park, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Spinler v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Tanner v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pankratz Farms, Inc. v. PankratzMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Payne v. KnutsonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. D.R. Four Beat Alliance, LLC v. Sierra Production Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Neal v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Eklund v. Wheatland CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API