Jenks v. Bertelsen
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 The plaintiffs and appellants, Robin and Cathy Jenks (Jenkses), brought a negligence action in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court to recover damages for personal injury from Neil Bertelsen (Bertelsen), defendant and respondent, arising out of an automobile accident. Following a trial and jury verdict, the District Court denied the Jenkses’ motion for a new trial. The Jenkses appeal. We affirm.
¶2 The following issues are presented on appeal:
f 3 1. Did the District Court err in excluding plaintiffs’ evidence of dealings with the insurance carrier in response to the defendant’s theory…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Massman v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- Lopez v. JosephsonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Keil v. Glacier Park, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
- Spinler v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Tanner v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pankratz Farms, Inc. v. PankratzMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Payne v. KnutsonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- D.R. Four Beat Alliance, LLC v. Sierra Production Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Neal v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Eklund v. Wheatland CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.