Legal Opinion

Judge v. Pocius

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1975No. Appeal, No. 344 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Peesident Judge Bowman,

The significant issue sought to be raised by the parties to this appeal concerning what actions of public officials constitute “setting of any official policy” proscribed by the Act of July 19, 1974, P. L. 486, 65 P. S. §261 et seq. (“Sunshine Law”), unless the prescribed public notice and public meeting criteria of the statute have been met, is misdirected, as the only possible issue that can be raised by this appeal is the propriety of the lower court order denying appellants’ application for a preliminary injunction.

The order of the lower court from which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong School District v. Armstrong Education Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Community Sports, Inc. v. Denver Ringsby Rockets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Sessa v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Judge v. PociusCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Yates v. Clifford Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Fantastic Plastics, Inc. v. FlahertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Sunshine Law, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API