People v. Artis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
The People appeal a judgment of dismissal after the court determined an embezzlement by a tenant could not be charged under Penal Code 1 section 484, the general theft statute, because the rule that a specific statute controls over general statutes requires prosecutors to charge such offenses as violations of section 507. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment.
I
After Chester Criton Artis sold a refrigerator he took without permission from the apartment he was renting, he was charged with petty theft with a prior conviction of a theft-related offense. (§§ 484/666.)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. DingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. DarlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. FendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bradwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. Shamim CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015