Legal Opinion

People v. Artis

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1993No. D017197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

The People appeal a judgment of dismissal after the court determined an embezzlement by a tenant could not be charged under Penal Code 1 section 484, the general theft statute, because the rule that a specific statute controls over general statutes requires prosecutors to charge such offenses as violations of section 507. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment.

I

After Chester Criton Artis sold a refrigerator he took without permission from the apartment he was renting, he was charged with petty theft with a prior conviction of a theft-related offense. (§§ 484/666.)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. DingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. DarlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Bradwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. Shamim CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API