Zelotes v. Martini
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action challenging the constitutionality of one provision of the Bankruptcy Code enacted in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”). Specifically, Plaintiff challenges 11 U.S.C. § 526(a)(4) as violative of the First Amendment. Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint in its entirety. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 11] is denied.
1. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a bankruptcy…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re RobinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz P.A. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Zelotes v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Adams v. Zenas Zelotes, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Connecticut Bar Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.