State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Biastoch Meats, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in a highway condemnation action.
The State of Montana, appellant here, acting through its Highway Commission, will be hereinafter referred to as the State. The respondent, Biastoch Meats, Inc., will be referred to as Biastoch Meats.
The eminent domain proceedings involve a complicated word description. We shall set forth here the situation as described by the State in their brief.
“The principal highway going west of Butte, Montana, is a four-lane highway designated as primary 10-91. As this highway approaches Butte from the west a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Henderson v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Ryan v. QuinlanMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Newton v. WeilerMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Alexander v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Coronado Oil Co. v. GrievesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Roope v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
- Dooling v. CaseyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. BennettMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. SchumacherMontana Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.