Legal Opinion

Neidenbach v. Amica Mutual Insurance

District Court, D. Missouri

Decided February 9, 2016No. 4:13-CV-1604 CASPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHARLES A. SHAW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s second motion for summary judgment. In a Memorandum and Order dated March 10, 2015, the Court granted defendant Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (“Arnica”) summary judgment as to *733plaintiffs’ claims against it. Arnica now moves that the Court enter summary judgment in its favor with regard to its counterclaim. The Neidenbachs oppose the motion, which is fully briefed and ready for disposition. For the following reasons, Arnica’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Wingate v. Gage County School Dist., No. 34Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CM Vantage Specialty Insurance Company v. Nephrite Fund, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  2. The Cincinnati Indemnity Company v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API