Legal Opinion

CERNAK v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 2009No. 2D08-123Published

1Opinion of the Court

998 So.2d 1214 (2009)

William CERNAK, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D08-123.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 30, 2009.

William Cernak, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

William Cernak challenges the final order that denied his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Mr. Cernak asserted four claims. We affirm without comment the postconviction court's denial of relief as to claim one as it appears moot.[1]…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Tarlbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Cernak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API