Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1999No. A-97-1299Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mues, Judge.

In State v. Hurst, ante p. 280, 289, 594 N.W.2d 303, 309 (1999), from the paragraph beginning “The law is well settled,” the opinion should read as follows:

The law is well settled in Nebraska that where a criminal statute is amended by mitigating the punishment, after commission of a prohibited act but before final judgment, the punishment is that provided by the amendatory act unless the Legislature has specifically held otherwise. State v. White, 256 Neb. 536, 590 N.W.2d 863 (1999); State v. Urbano, 256 Neb. 194, 589 N.W.2d 144 (1999); Jones v. Clarke, 253 Neb. 161, 568 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. UrbanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SchreinNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GroffNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Jones v. ClarkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API