Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. De Cresenzo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 19, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action upon a promissory note to recover the deficiency remaining on a mortgage following a Massachusetts foreclosure sale, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated April 11, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In this case, the Supreme Court properly gave full faith and credit to a Massachusetts judgment. New York courts can review judgments of sister States to the extent of ascertaining *824whether those courts possessed personal jurisdiction…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leasing Service Corp. v. Diamond Timber, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Augusta Lumber & Supply, Inc. v. Herbert H. Sabbeth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Fielding v. DrewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Franklin Society for Home Building & Savings v. WesemanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gramercy Investment Trust v. Lakemont Homes Nevada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Schulz v. BarrowsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Union Realty Partners, Ltd. v. MenicucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. PenaNew York Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.