Legal Opinion

Gigliotti v. Jacksina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

The only question requiring consideration in this court is whether the City Court of Rome had jurisdiction of the controversy between the parties.

*369The summons was duly issued and on July 27, 1922, was served on the defendant. A complaint verified on the following fifth day of August was filed at a date not given in the record. The defendants interposed an unverified answer and the issues were tried before a jury on August 15, 1922, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff of $500 upon which judgment was entered.

The complaint was for commissions in selling real estate. - The demand for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Heffron v. JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Hamburger v. HellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Bellinger v. FordNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Bowditch v. SalisburyNew York Supreme Court · 1812

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dobrikin v. Union Railway Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1927
  2. Central Park-West 84th Street Corp. v. CusackCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927
  3. Davis v. JerrellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Abbey Rent A Car, Inc. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Taylor v. GoodrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API