Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1903No. Nos. 13,582—(72)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the -district court for Henne-pin county, Pond, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

'COLLINS, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while in defendant’s employ as a boilermaker’s helper, defendant being the owner of the shop in which the accident happened. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum-of $1,500, which was subsequently reduced by the court to $1,000. The appeal is from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial.

We are of the opinion that the order must be affirmed in part, but that a new trial should have been granted. The plaintiff had worked about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Northwestern Tel. Exch. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Franklin v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Teal v. American Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Delude v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Swanson v. OakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Jensen v. Commodore Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API