Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Hendricks

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 17, 2008No. 05-5389UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

Ramon Hernandez appeals the District Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We granted a certificate of appealability to consider whether the state trial court’s failure to convene a hearing regarding the prosecutor’s allegedly improper use of peremptory challenges violated Hernandez’s rights to equal protection and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court found that Hernandez’s request for a “Gilmore hearing” was a state law claim not subject to federal habeas review. We also asked…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HAYES v. TICEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Simmers v. State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API