Legal Opinion
WildEarth Guardians v. Conner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 15, 2019No. 17-1334PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The dispute before us concerns the Tennessee Creek Project (the Project), an effort of the United States Forest Service (the Service) in the San Isabel and White River National Forests to protect the forest from insects, disease, and fire; improve wildlife habitat; and maintain watershed conditions. In 2014 the Service published an environmental assessment (EA) of the Project, followed by a Decision Notice (DN) and Finding of No Significant Impact *1251 (FONSI). One of the EA's many conclusions was that the Project was unlikely to adversely affect Canada lynx, and the DN/FONSI…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- Integrity Advance v. CFPBCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Canada Geese Protection Colorado LLC v. LowneyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Lee ZeldinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026
- Citizens for A Healthy Community v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.