Legal Opinion

Roumain v. Moody

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 12, 1954No. 41857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us for the second time on writs sought by counsel for the plaintiff during the course of its trial. The trial *189judge, in each instance, feeling bound by the holding in State ex rel. Marston v. Marston, 223 La. 1046, 67 So.2d 587, has stayed the proceedings in his court while the application for writs was pending here.

We thought we had ¡made it clear in our per curiam to the refusal of the first writ in the instant case that the holding in the Marston case was not intended to interfere with the orderly processes of trial in the district courts. In order, however, to avoid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. STATE Ex Rel. MARSTON v. MARSTONSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DoucetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Vincent v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Reiley v. Atlas Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API