Legal Opinion

Popik v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

A refusal by a landlord to renew a lease on the ground that he will use the premises as a primary residence for himself or a member of his immediate family (see, Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2524.4 [a] [1]) must be predicated on notice of termination served between 150 and 120 days prior to the actual termination date (see, Quigley v Russo, 133 Misc 2d 137, 138). Such termination date should be ascertained from "a lease from which these dates can be calculated” (Ansonia Assocs. v Consiglio, 163 AD2d 98, 99). The issue of a landlord’s noncompliance with this limitation of time could be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parcel 242 Realty v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Rosen v. WadeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979
  3. Ansonia Associates v. ConsiglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Popik v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Quigley v. RussoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API