Legal Opinion
Mayrson v. Chaplin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1981No. 11674PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
..GULOTTA, Judge.
Sidney A. Chaplin, appealing from a judgment ordering him to pay past-due support and denying his petition to annul earlier support judgments, claims the Louisiana court lacks jurisdiction because neither he nor his divorced wife nor the children reside in Louisiana. Sidney claims he moved from the state in 1972 and his divorced wife, Barbara, left Louisiana in 1973. Sidney further claims he was denied “due process” or “equal protection” because of the failure by his attorney and by the curator appointed to represent him to inform him timely of the Louisiana proceedings.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Imperial v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Holden v. HoldenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Webb v. WebbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Parker v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Miller v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. JuergensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Anderson v. AndersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Drago v. DragoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Meunier v. MeunierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983