Spires v. South Bound Railroad
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Action by James Jesse Spires, minor, by guardian ad litem, against South Bound Railroad Company, for damages to his person. Nonsuit granted. Plaintiff appeals. cite Kaminitsky v. R. R., 25 S. C., 53; Am. & Fng. Ency. of Raw, vol. 4, p. 910; Mttrray v. A. C. R. R., 10 Rich.
Read the full summary
Action by James Jesse Spires, minor, by guardian ad litem, against South Bound Railroad Company, for damages to his person. Nonsuit granted. Plaintiff appeals. cite Kaminitsky v. R. R., 25 S. C., 53; Am. & Fng. Ency. of Raw, vol. 4, p. 910; Mttrray v. A. C. R. R., 10 Rich. Raw, 227. cite Sanders v. Guano Co., 19 S. C., 510; White v. R. R. Co., 30 S. C., 219; Fell v. R. R. Co., 33 S. C., 200; Barber v. R. R. Co., 34 S. C., 452; Jenkins v. McCartha, 22 S. E. R., •883; LCinard v. C, N. & L. R. R., 39 ,S. C., 514.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
The appeal herein is from an order granting a nonsuit. The action was for damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. The allegations of negligence are contained in paragraph two of the complaint, as follows:
“2. That on the 20th day of B>ecember, 1893, while the plaintiff, James Jesse Spires, was traveling along the public road in Rexington County, which said road the defendant’s railroad crosses at a point between two and three miles north *29of the station upon said railroad called…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Durst v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Pendleton v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Clifford v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Sutton v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- McKain v. Camden Water, Light & Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.