Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Frey
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 29, 2011No. 5D10-2068PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.
In Nichols v. State Farm Mutual, 851 So.2d 742, 746 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), this court stated that a “proposal for settlement is intended to end judicial labor, not create more.” (Citation omitted.) This case is but another example demonstrating that the authorizing statute and implementing rule encourage just the opposite. The issue in this appeal is the validity of a proposal for settlement that conditions acceptance on dismissing a defendant who is not an offeror. 1
Appellants, Kimberly M. Andrews and her minor daughter, Kyla Andrews, filed suit against Shannon D. Frey and Rudolph E. Frey, her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Willis Shaw Express, Inc. v. Hilyer Sod, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund, Inc. v. GorkaSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Nichols v. State Farm Mut.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Frosti v. CreelSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Valerie Audiffred v. Thomas B. ArnoldSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Wolfe v. Culpepper Constructors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Health First, Inc. v. CataldoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- saritha reddy Paduru and Ravi Anugu v. Allison W. KlinkenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Arnold v. AudiffredDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.