Legal Opinion

Arnold Ray Seligmann & Co. v. Grotsky

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 15, 1922Published

Action under a lease by tenant to recover cost of alterations.

1Opinion of the CourtGenung, J.

The action is brought by a tenant under a written lease to recover from the owner of certain premises, known as No. 7 West Thirty-sixth street, for the expense incurred in making alterations to comply with an order for the widening of the roadway and sidewalk of West Thirty-sixth street, Manhattan.

The plaintiff was in possession under a written lease executed on June 27, 1904, and assigned on December 11, 1905, to a partnership, to the business of which plaintiff succeeded. The defendant obtained title to such premises on June 30, 1921, subject to said lease and assignment. On or about June…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Herald Square Realty Co. v. . Saks Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Pross v. Excelsior Cleaning & Dyeing Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1920
  3. City of New York v. United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Younger v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Cohen v. MargoliesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API