Legal Opinion

Carter Coal Co. v. Dozier

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 22, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt —

Affirming.

*458The appellee, Willie Dozier, who was a thirteen-year-old boy, complaining that he had received very severe injuries because of the negligence of the appellant, Carter Coal Company, who, at the time and place of his injury, owed him the duty of exercising ordinary care not to injure him, instituted this action to recover of the appellant a large sum in damages. This is the second appeal of the action to this court. The opinion upon the first appeal may be found in 170 Ky. 374, where the pertinent facts of the case are stated. Upon the return of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  2. Samuels & Co. v. T. M. Gilmore & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Goff v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Carter Coal Co. v. DozierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rammage v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Cumberland Railroad v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API