Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Peterson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 2017No. SJC 12097PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaziano, J.

General Laws c. 94C, § 32J, the so-called school zone statute, punishes individuals who commit certain enumerated drug offenses within 300 feet of a school or one hundred feet of a public park or playground. In 1992, we determined that the school zone statute does not violate a defendant’s due process rights, but cautioned that “[t]here may be extraordinary circumstances shown in some cases which would make it unfair to find guilt under § 32J.” Commonwealth v. Alvarez, 413 Mass. 224, 228, 230 n.5 (1992). This case tests the bounds of school zone statute liability. The issue presented is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Attorney General v. School Committee of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. RoucouletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. State v. IvorySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tom Brakke and Rhonda Brakke D/B/A/ Pine Ridge Hunting Lodge, and McBra, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Iowa Natural Resource CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. Wilbur W., a juvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  5. Finn v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API