Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Chandler, Gardner & Williams, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

This court has held in Chandler-Gardner & Williams, Inc. v. Reynolds, 250 Mass. 309, that a contract in the terms of the paper signed by Mrs. Farrell is valid. The question for our determination is whether she is bound by her signature to the contract. The rule of law is well stated in Atlas Shoe Co. v. Bloom, 209 Mass. 563, 567: “In the absence of fraud practised upon him, . . . mere ignorance of the contents of an instrument which a party voluntarily executes is not sufficient ground for setting it aside if ultimately the paper is found to be different from what he supposed it to be. Rice…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Leddy v. BarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Freedley v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Atlas Shoe Co. v. BloomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. McNamara v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Kidder v. GreenmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Club Aluminum Co. v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Becker College of Business Administration & Secretarial Science v. GrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API