Legal Opinion

Agro v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 31, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Plaintiffs 1 appeal from an order of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) dismissing their complaint against New England Telephone Co. (NET). Plaintiffs argue that the PUC exceeded its statutory authority by dismissing their complaint, a complaint that has substantive merit, on the basis that Plaintiffs could obtain complete relief in other dockets currently pending or soon to be brought before the PUC. Because the dismissal is not warranted by the language and history of the statute, we vacate and remand the case to the PUC.

Plaintiffs are telephone customers who reside in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. NilesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Industrial Constructors, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Holmquist v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Jennifer Gamage v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  5. Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API