Legal Opinion

Arsenal Garage Co. v. Fraley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1924No. Appeal, 66PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff has judgment in a suit to get back money paid under mistake of fact. The court refused defendant’s motion, for judgment n. o. v.; and that refusal is assigned for error. As there is ample evidence to support the verdict, we must affirm. Defendant’s employees did electrical work in plaintiff’s garage in July and August, 1919. During part of the period, another contractor erected an electrical sign on the garage, defendant not being equipped to do that work. Defendant’s workmen, — union men, — then learned that the sign had been put up by nonunion labor and quit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kunkel v. KunkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Potter v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mount Union Borough v. KunzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API