Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Caraway
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 10, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
In this habeas corpus action brought pro se, the Petitioner seeks issuance of the writ under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 or § 2254 “to vacate the July 2, 2009, JUDGMENT of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Sanders v. United States, No. 05-CO-1580....” Pet., ECF No. 1, at 1 (capitalization in original). Because this Court is not a reviewing court, it cannot grant such relief. Rather, as discussed below, this Court’s habeas jurisdiction over convictions entered by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and reviewable by the D.C. Court of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Premo v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reed v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. BrockDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025