Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 16, 1996No. Nos. 1130, 1103, 1101, 1215, 1149, 1175, Dockets 95-1318, 95-1319, 95-1320, 95-1428, 95-1429, 95-1441PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Darren Nelson, Ezra Clarke, Shannon Richards, Angel Alonso, Ruben Col-*1318lazo and Merton Taylor appeal from convictions for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1951, the Hobbs Act, following a jury trial before Judge Edward R. Korman in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. They assert a variety of errors relating to jury selection, evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, sufficiency of the evidence against them and sentencing. For the reasons stated below, the convictions are affirmed.

Background

Defendants, all of whom are Black or Latino,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Bernard Cullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter BacanovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Frances E. Weeks v. New York State (Division of Parole) & Patrick HoyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API