Simon v. Sempliner
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Ohamplin, 0. J.
There is but one question to be decided in this case, viz.: Did the justice of the peace, who rendered a judgment for plaintiffs, lose jurisdiction by not proceeding at the time to which the cause had been adjourned by mutual consent, — March 12, 1890?
The return day of the summons was March 6, 1890, at 9 o’clock A. m. The plaintiffs appeared by their attorney, who duly proved his authority. The defendant appeared in person and by Albert H. Briggs, clerk for Shepard & Lyon, who were the attorneys for the defendant. It was then mutually agreed that the cause should stand…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Patterson v. McReaMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Parmalee v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hobbs v. the German-American DoctorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904