Legal Opinion · Dissent

Childers v. Floyd

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 8, 2010No. 08-15590Published

1DissentTjoflat, Circuit Judge

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), Pub.L. No. 104-132, § 104, 110 Stat. 1214, 1218-19 (1996), amended provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As amended, § 2254 prohibits a federal court from granting a writ of habeas corpus with respect to a claim that was adjudicated on the merits in a state proceeding unless the adjudication(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or(2) resulted in a decision that was based on an…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API