State v. Jackson
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
LEVINSON, Justice,
concurring in amended opinion.*
I agree with the majority that “Jackson received a fair trial, free from reversible error, and that sufficient evidence was presented by the prosecution to support his convictions.” Majority opinion at 74. I also agree with the majority that “the circuit court erred in concluding that the commencement of [Jackson’s] trial was within the time limits set forth in [Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) ] Rule 48,” and that, therefore, “we have no choice but to vacate Jackson’s convictions and remand for entry of an order dismissing the charges…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HoeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MalufauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EstencionHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HutchHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.