Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Jackson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1996No. 17367Published

1Concurrence

LEVINSON, Justice,

concurring in amended opinion.*

I agree with the majority that “Jackson received a fair trial, free from reversible error, and that sufficient evidence was presented by the prosecution to support his convictions.” Majority opinion at 74. I also agree with the majority that “the circuit court erred in concluding that the commencement of [Jackson’s] trial was within the time limits set forth in [Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) ] Rule 48,” and that, therefore, “we have no choice but to vacate Jackson’s convictions and remand for entry of an order dismissing the charges…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. HoeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. MalufauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. EstencionHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. HutchHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API