Legal Opinion
State v. Rodriguez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 28, 1986No. 86-119PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
496 So.2d 240 (1986)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Manuel RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.
No. 86-119.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 28, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven T. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
We affirm the sentence under review departing downward from the sentencing guidelines upon a holding that the trial court gave clear and convincing reasons, supported by the record, for the departure and, accordingly,…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. TwelvesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State v. RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ForbesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- State v. MoralesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- State v. FrinksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. HunterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. HollisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.