Robinson v. Citizens Trust Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
. Appeal from Benton Circuit Court.- — Eon. G. A. ■ ■ Galvird, Judge. (1) The question of agency is one of law and under the law Moore was the agent of Robinson. Engleman v. Ruse, 28 N. W. 149; Goodale v. Middaugh, 46 Pac. 14; Cooper v. Headley, 12 N. J. Eq. 48; May v. Insurance Company, 72 Mo. App. 286. (2) Moore her ing in possession of the security, the Trust- Company had a right to pay him the money. Cummings v. Herd, 49 Mo.
Read the full summary
. Appeal from Benton Circuit Court.- — Eon. G. A. ■ ■ Galvird, Judge. (1) The question of agency is one of law and under the law Moore was the agent of Robinson. Engleman v. Ruse, 28 N. W. 149; Goodale v. Middaugh, 46 Pac. 14; Cooper v. Headley, 12 N. J. Eq. 48; May v. Insurance Company, 72 Mo. App. 286. (2) Moore her ing in possession of the security, the Trust- Company had a right to pay him the money. Cummings v. Herd, 49 Mo. App. 146; Meehem on Agency, sec. 373; Dawson v. Wombles, 111 Mo. App. 541. (1) Moore might have been the agent of the plaintiffs at one stage of the proceedings, of…
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson', J.
This action is for the cancellation of certain promissory notes and deeds of trust executed and delivered by plaintiffs to the Citizens Trust Company of Boonville. A jury was waived and after hearing the evidence the court rendered judgment for plaintiffs in accordance with the prayer of the petition. The defendant Trust Company appealed.
On May 13, 1913, plaintiffs, who are husband and wife- and reside on a farm in Benton county owned by the husband, executed and delivered to the Citizens Trust Company of Boonville their promissory note for $700 payable May 10, 1918, together with annual…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- May v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- Debord v. PendletonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924