Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartman v. Tresise

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1906No. 4912Published

Appeal from the District Court of Gunnison County. Hon. Theron Stevens, Judge. Action by A. Hartman against George Tresise. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Decision en banc. Chief Justice Gabbert, Mr. Justice Goddard and Mr. Justice Maxwell concur. Mr. Justice Gunter concurs specially. Mr. Justice Steele and Mr. Justice Bailey dissent.

1DissentJustice Bailey

After the former opinion of the court was announced, the attorney-general, on behalf of the state, was permitted to intervene, and, upon re-argument, I am convinced that the opinion announced by the majority of the court is erroneous for the following-reasons :

The Angles and Saxons, who, in company with the Jutes, invaded and conquered England in the latter part of the fifth and .earlier portion of the sixth centuries, were an energetic, freedom-loving people, excessively fond of out-door sports, hunting and fishing. These characteristics were accentuated and emphasized by the Norsemen…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Schulte v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Faull v. CookeOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Beckman v. KreamerIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. State Tax-Law CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API