City of Tulsa v. Crain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
City of Tulsa (Tulsa) filed the present proceeding seeking a permanent mandatory injunction. Tulsa sought to require defendants to comply with certain requirements set forth by the Tulsa Board of Adjustment (Board) in two earlier orders granting defendants zoning exceptions to erect two buildings on their property. In the alternative Tulsa sought removal of a building constructed by defendants as an expansion of their already non-conforming use, in violation of Tulsa’s zoning ordinances.
Defendants operated an automobile salvage business on certain property on the north edge of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Donovan v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Semke v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Motor Vehicle CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Harrell v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Brigance v. Velvet Dove RestaurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Robinson v. Sunshine Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Mowles Ex Rel. Mowles v. Hillcrest Health CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Mares v. LockardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.