Legal Opinion

Family Federal Savings Bank v. Hughes

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1994No. 93-SC-185-DGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

An issue of interest prompts this appeal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of Boyd Circuit Court which determined that Family Federal Savings Bank, a debtor, was liable for interest on the amount of money deposited into court, pursuant to court order.

This litigation began as a bank foreclosure action wherein it was determined that appel-lees, John T. and Janice Hughes, held a first mortgage against the subject real property and appellant held a subordinate lien. Appellant purchased the realty, at a court ordered sale, and was directed to deposit an amount with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Toro v. Di-La-Ch, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Blasini-Stern v. Beech-Nut Life Savers Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976
  3. Faulkner v. SmithKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Eddington-Griffitts Construction Co. v. IrelandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. HollonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arete Partners, L.P. v. GunnermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. Arete Partners, LP v. GunnermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API