Legal Opinion

Melvin Green, Inc. v. Questor Drilling Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 7, 1997No. 07-96-0349-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVIS, Justice.

At issue herein is the applicability of an indemnity clause in a drilling contract to a “consultant” who was not a party to the contract between the well operator and the drilling contractor. Melvin Green, Inc. and Melvin Green individually (herein collectively called Green) bring this appeal complaining that the trial court erred in granting the cross-motion for summary judgment of Que-stor Drilling Corporation (herein Questor) and in denying Green’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Ken Petroleum (as operator) and Questor (as contractor), entered into a written contract…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State Farm Life Insurance Co v. BeastonTexas Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sun Operating Ltd. Partnership v. Holt, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  2. Francis v. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Beneke Co. v. Economy Lodging Systems, Inc. (In Re Economy Lodging Systems, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Quisenberry v. American State Bank (In Re Quisenberry)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
  5. Diana Godines, Individually and on Behalf of Amando Godines, Sr., Michael Godines Amando Godines, Jr. And Deanna Quitugua v. Parsley Energy Operations, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API