Bowen v. Holland
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hutcheson, Justice.
1. “A bill of exceptions may in this court be amended by the record so as to include the names of all necessary or proper parties who might have been joined with the party excepting as plaintiffs in error.” Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Griffith, 111 Ga. 551 (36 S. E. 859); Ramey v. O’Byrne, 121 Ga. 516 (2) (49 S. E. 595); Southern Railway Co. v. Lancaster, 149 Ga. 434 (100 S. E. 380); Huey v. National Bank of Fitzgerald, 177 Ga. 64 (169 S. E. 491).
2. “To constitute a valid gift, there must be the intention to give by the donor, acceptance by the donee, and delivery of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Bailey v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Ramey v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Clark v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Huey v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Knight v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Webb v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Cannon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Chatfield v. DenningtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Bowen v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.