Dunham v. Dunham
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Jefferson District Court. — C. W. Vermilion, Judge. The plaintiff has verdict and judgment for a land broker’s commission, and this appeal presents various objections thereto.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
*8351. Trial: ob .lections to conclusion statements. *834I. Applying settled rules of practice in this court, we consider this appeal on the points relied on for reversal, as amplified by the brief points. We have so *835often held that review must thus be limited that we pretermit citations.
II. One claim by plaintiff was that the vice-president of the defendant had consented to a contract of sale made with one Kerr, although this contract involved some departure from the terms fixed by defendant in employing the plaintiff to sell or find a buyer for the land.
There was much controversy, and there were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- State v. StrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Clay v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Wells v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Shilling v. Sioux City Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Giltner v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Driscoll v. BunarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Kellogg v. RhodesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Morton v. DrichelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946