Claim of Davis v. Prudential Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1051Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur; Herlihy, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the claim, in the following memorandum: The decision appealed from should be reversed upon the law and the claim dismissed. Upon the present record the injury sustained is in no way the result of the environment in which his employment east him. There was nothing inherent in the recreational activity which could have been reasonably foreseen or expected as hazardous. The injury is completely unrelated with anything other than the purely personal activity of dancing and apparently…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Foos v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992