Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1950No. L. A. 21048; L. A. 21049Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.2d 409 (1950)

DOROTHY FINNEGAN, Respondent,

v.

ROYAL REALTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.

L. A. No. 21048.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 12, 1950.

Lasher B. Gallagher, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Norman S. Sterry, Gerold C. Dunn and Frederick H. Sturdy for Appellant.

Walker, Meyers, Ingram & Moser, Parker, Stanbury & Reese and Raymond G. Stanbury for Respondents.

CARTER, J.

These appeals are taken by the defendant, Royal Realty Company, a corporation, from judgments for plaintiffs entered upon verdicts of a jury in two actions for damages for personal injuries. The complaints…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API